JM Share Pack — Public Pack

Johnny Museum Research · Presidio La Bahía cluster · v0.4l

What this page is

The client-facing narrative draft, written to be readable straight through. Each narrative block is immediately followed by one or more claim cards that show posture labels and verification links.

How to use it

Note: This is versioned and review-gated until stakeholder feedback is logged.

Johnny Museum — Presidio La Bahía Cluster

Public Pack v0.3 (publish-ready candidate) — museum-copy draft restored and audit-linked (pack build v0.4l).

Purpose a compact, shareable “museum-grade” packet that can be reviewed by multiple stakeholders
Scope Presidio La Bahía (primary) + satellites: Fannin battleground, Angel of Goliad, Zaragoza Birthplace
Quality controls posture publish-ready candidate; stewardship/legal language remains gated until executed docs are captured

Provenance (addresses “where did this text come from?”): This page restores the earlier longform Public Pack museum-copy draft (items 1–6) and re-attaches each paragraph to evidence via claim cards. Where the restored wording conflicted with explicit scope lock, the smallest possible edit was made and flagged inline.

All claim cards (index for auditors)

1) Interpretive spine (Presidio-first)

Four chapter lenses (working set):

  1. Borderlands & Empire: why forts exist; shifting sovereign claims; community life.
  2. Mission/Presidio System: paired institutions; coercion, survival, negotiation.
  3. Revolution & Memory (1835–1836): captivity, violence, remembrance.
  4. Afterlives & Stewardship: monuments, public memory, living sacred use, public interpretation.

Satellites are modules that feed these chapters; they do not create parallel spines.

Claim Supported CC-PP-001
Scope lock: Presidio-first (satellites feed the Presidio spine)

Presidio La Bahía is the primary interpretive anchor for this project. Satellite sites (Fannin battleground, Angel of Goliad, Zaragoza Birthplace) are treated as modules that map into the Presidio chapter spine—not parallel narratives.

Where to see: Public Pack §1
Evidence
  • Scope lock (in-pack) — Governance / project constraint (client-reviewed).
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable
Claim Proposal CC-PP-002
Interpretive spine: four chapter lenses (working set)

Working interpretive lenses: (1) Borderlands & Empire, (2) Mission/Presidio System, (3) Revolution & Memory (1835–1836), (4) Afterlives & Stewardship. These are planning lenses to organize exhibit copy and are expected to refine during stakeholder review.

Where to see: Public Pack §1
Evidence
  • Intent + Masterplan Chronology (in-pack) — Project intent + staged plan context.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable

2A) Museum copy v0.3 — Visitor Center Orientation Panel

Presidio La Bahía: A Crossroads of Borderlands History

Presidio La Bahía formed part of a Spanish colonial community that later anchored travel, trade, and military life in this region. Established in the early 1720s, the Presidio relocated several times before settling near its present location by the mid‑18th century.

Claim Conservative CC-PP-003
Presidio establishment wording stays conservative (milestone disagreement: 1721 vs 1749)

Different sources use different milestones when describing “established/founded.” One uses a 1721 establishment milestone; another uses a 1749 milestone tied to the current location. Until we choose a milestone definition, public wording stays at “early 1720s,” while keeping the discrepancy visible in Gates (R2).

Where to see: Public Pack §2A · Gates R2
Evidence

In the 1800s, La Bahía became a focal point in wars for independence. During the Texas Revolution, Texian prisoners were held here and executed on March 27, 1836—events remembered as the Goliad Massacre. The Presidio’s story is therefore not a single narrative, but an overlapping history of communities shaped by shifting empires and contested borders.

Claim Supported CC-PP-006
Texas Revolution captivity + execution date (Goliad Massacre context: March 27, 1836)

During the 1836 crisis, Texian prisoners were held at Presidio La Bahía and executed on March 27, 1836 (including Col. James Fannin). The event is remembered as the Goliad Massacre.

Where to see: Public Pack §2A
Evidence

Today, the fort remains a working historic site and a living place of memory. Its chapel, courtyards, and walls invite visitors to consider how power is built, defended, and remembered—and how commemoration shapes what later generations understand.

Claim Proposal CC-PP-007
Interpretive framing: site as layered place of memory (public-facing copy)

The orientation-panel language frames the Presidio as a layered place of memory where power, devotion, and commemoration overlap. This is interpretive museum copy, not a new research conclusion.

Where to see: Public Pack §2A
Evidence
  • Interpretive spine (in-pack) — Copy is governed by the chapter lenses and scope lock.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable

Scope-lock edit note: the earlier draft named the nearby Espíritu Santo mission; the mission site is explicitly out-of-scope as a standalone module in this project, so the reference was generalized.

2B) Museum copy v0.3 — Chapel Panel

Our Lady of Loreto Chapel (completed 1779)

The Presidio’s chapel is the site’s most enduring interior space—architecturally distinct, long used, and deeply layered in meaning. Its groin‑vaulted ceiling and later artistic additions (including a 1946 fresco) mark both continuity and change: an 18th‑century frontier chapel that became, over time, a communal landmark for worship, ceremony, and remembrance.

Claim Supported CC-PP-008
Our Lady of Loreto Chapel: completion (1779) + notable artistic features (1946 fresco)

The visitor guide states the chapel was completed in 1779 and notes features including a groin-vaulted ceiling and a 1946 fresco by Antonio Garcia.

Where to see: Public Pack §2B
Evidence

Standing here, visitors encounter a difficult overlap: sacred space and military space, devotion and violence, personal grief and public memory.

Claim Proposal CC-PP-009
Interpretive framing: sacred space and military space overlap

The chapel-panel language explicitly acknowledges overlap between sacred use and military/war history. This is interpretive framing intended to be handled carefully in public interpretation.

Where to see: Public Pack §2B
Evidence
  • Project intent (in-pack) — We label uncertainty and avoid overclaiming.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable

2C) Museum copy v0.3 — Field Module: Goliad Massacre / Fannin

“Remember Goliad”

In March 1836, more than 300 Texian prisoners were held at Presidio La Bahía after the Battle of Coleto. They were marched out in groups and executed—an event remembered as the Goliad Massacre. Colonel James Fannin was among those killed.

Claim Supported CC-PP-010
Captivity + battle context: “more than 300” prisoners and the Battle of Coleto

The visitor guide states the chapel held “more than 300” captive prisoners before their massacre after the Battle of Coleto, and also provides March 27, 1836 execution context.

Where to see: Public Pack §2C
Evidence

For many Texans, the executions became a rallying cry—“Remember Goliad!” For visitors today, it is also a lens on wartime captivity, command decisions, and the human costs of revolution.

Claim Supported CC-PP-011
“Remember Goliad!” as a battle cry (as described by a THC historic site page)

A THC historic site page for the Fannin Battleground states that the unanticipated execution inflamed the Texas cause and spurred the battle cry “Remember Goliad!”

Where to see: Public Pack §2C
Evidence

2D) Museum copy v0.3 — Micro-label: Angel of Goliad

A bronze statue honors Francisca (Francita) Alvarez, remembered in local tradition for acts of compassion toward Texian prisoners during the 1836 crisis at La Bahía. This story is often told through commemoration and community memory; where possible, this project traces how and when the story enters the written record.

Claim Tradition CC-PP-012
Angel of Goliad micro-label stays framed as tradition (secondary sources exist; primary trail still open)

The micro-label frames the “Angel of Goliad” story as commemoration/tradition. Secondary sources describe acts of compassion attributed to Francita Alavez/Álvarez, but until a primary documentation trail is assembled, public wording stays careful and explicitly notes the tradition boundary.

Where to see: Public Pack §2D · Gates R3
Evidence

Documentation anchor (modern): Separate from the 1836 tradition story, modern documentation exists for the Angel of Goliad Plaza work (MOU trail + $500k line item). This supports stewardship context but does not itself authenticate the 1836 compassion narrative.

Claim Supported CC-PP-004
Angel of Goliad documentation anchor: MOU parties + $500k line item

A documented MOU trail exists for the Angel of Goliad Plaza work: (a) the MOU identifies parties (Texas Historical Commission and Goliad County), and (b) a committee packet excerpt states THC will pay $500,000 for adjacent County-owned land including the Angel of Goliad Plaza (context: proposed agreement).

Evidence

2E) Museum copy v0.3 — Micro-label: Zaragoza Birthplace

Ignacio Zaragoza: A Mexican National Hero

Ignacio Zaragoza is celebrated for leading Mexican forces to victory over a larger French army at Puebla in 1862—an event commemorated as Cinco de Mayo. The birthplace site near Presidio La Bahía connects local history to broader 19th‑century North American struggles over sovereignty, empire, and national identity.

Claim Supported CC-PP-013
Ignacio Zaragoza + Puebla (May 5, 1862) and Cinco de Mayo linkage

A THC page for the Zaragoza Birthplace describes Zaragoza’s leadership at Puebla on May 5, 1862 and notes that the victory is commonly known as Cinco de Mayo.

Where to see: Public Pack §2E
Evidence

3) Docent talk v0.3 (12–15 minutes; reconciled wording)

Claim Conservative CC-PP-014
Docent talk uses reconciled wording (mirrors the claim ledger)

The docent talk is a reconciled summary for live interpretation. It reuses conservative phrasing (e.g., “early 1720s,” “more than 300”) and explicitly keeps tradition-framed items labeled as such.

Where to see: Public Pack §3
Evidence

4) Transparency micro-panel (“How we know”)

This exhibit is built from official records, historic site publications, and peer‑reviewed research. When sources disagree, we label uncertainty and keep a record of why a date or claim was chosen. Ask staff for the “Evidence Binder” to see the sources behind specific statements.

Claim Supported CC-PP-015
Transparency micro-panel: disagreement handling + evidence binder availability

The pack is designed so public-facing statements map to evidence (Library) and uncertainty is labeled (Gates). This is the governance posture of the project and is presented to stakeholders as the “How we know” method.

Where to see: Public Pack §4
Evidence
  • Status ledger (in-pack) — Shows posture counts and click-through to claim cards.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable

5) Open gates (still pending)

See Gates for closure recipes and the R2 two-sided evidence card.

Claim Gated CC-PP-005
Open gates: stewardship wording + founding-year milestone + Angel documentation trail

Some language remains intentionally constrained until gates close: (R5) stewardship/mandate wording pending executed documents; (R2) founding-year milestone selection; (R3) Angel of Goliad documentation trail (keep as tradition until a primary trail is captured).

Evidence
  • Gates register (in-pack) — Closure recipes and evidence pointers live on the Gates page.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable

6) “What success looks like” (for Jonny)

Claim Proposal CC-PP-016
Success criteria: coherent Presidio-first story + auditable sentences

Project success is defined operationally: a coherent Presidio-first storyline, optional satellite modules, and auditability (every public-facing sentence maps to a posture and evidence).

Where to see: Public Pack §6
Evidence
  • Scope lock + ledger method (in-pack) — Governance artifacts define what “success” means.
    Links: 🧷 Jump (in-pack) stable